Current:Home > InvestAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-12 11:26:42
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (98)
Related
- 'Most Whopper
- Study Finds Global Warming Fingerprint on 2022’s Northern Hemisphere Megadrought
- Does Love Is Blind Still Work? Lauren Speed-Hamilton Says...
- Sinking Land and Rising Seas Threaten Manila Bay’s Coastal Communities
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- The marketing whiz behind chia pets and their iconic commercials has died
- Sweden's Northvolt wants to rival China's battery dominance to power electric cars
- A beginner's guide to getting into gaming
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Reneé Rapp Leaving The Sex Lives Of College Girls Amid Season 3
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- He lost $340,000 to a crypto scam. Such cases are on the rise
- Wisconsin Advocates Push to Ensure $700 Million in Water Infrastructure Improvements Go to Those Who Need It Most
- Good jobs Friday
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- How DOES your cellphone work? A new exhibition dials into the science
- Fox's newest star Jesse Watters boasts a wink, a smirk, and a trail of outrage
- Alix Earle Influenced Me To Add These 20 Products to My Amazon Cart for Prime Day 2023
Recommendation
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
Ohio Senate Contest Features Two Candidates Who Profess Love for Natural Gas
Tom Cruise and Son Connor Cruise Make Rare Joint Outing Together in NYC
Arizona’s New Governor Takes on Water Conservation and Promises to Revise the State’s Groundwater Management Act
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Olaplex Is on Sale for Amazon Prime Day 2023 at a Major Discount: Don’t Miss Out on Shiny, Strong Hair
FTC and Justice Department double down on strategy to go after corporate monopolies
Why government websites and online services are so bad