Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Chainkeen View
Date:2025-04-07 15:32:29
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (677)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Extra! New strategies for survival by South Carolina newspapers
- The Biggest Threat to Growing Marijuana in California Used to Be the Law. Now, it’s Climate Change
- McConnell’s Record on Coal Has Become a Hot Topic in His Senate Campaign
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Ahead of the Climate Summit, Environmental Groups Urge Biden to Champion Methane Reductions as a Quick Warming Fix
- New Jersey county uses innovative program to treat and prevent drug overdoses
- 83-year-old man becomes street musician to raise money for Alzheimer's research
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Chris Hemsworth Reacts to Scorsese and Tarantino's Super Depressing Criticism of Marvel Movies
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Power Plants on Indian Reservations Get No Break on Emissions Rules
- Power Plants on Indian Reservations Get No Break on Emissions Rules
- Czech Esports Star Karel “Twisten” Asenbrener Dead at 19
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Keystone Pipeline Spills 383,000 Gallons of Oil into North Dakota Wetlands
- Celebrating July 2, America's other Independence Day
- Why Jinger Duggar Vuolo Didn’t Participate in Shiny Happy People: Duggar Family Secrets
Recommendation
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
22 Father's Day Gift Ideas for the TV & Movie-Obsessed Dad
Interactive: Superfund Sites Vulnerable to Climate Change
Full transcript of Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Massachusetts Sues Exxon Over Climate Change, Accusing the Oil Giant of Fraud
The Best Powder Sunscreens That Prevent Shine Without Ruining Makeup
Dismissing Trump’s EPA Science Advisors, Regan Says the Agency Will Return to a ‘Fair and Transparent Process’