Current:Home > ContactBiden administration allows ban on some Apple Watch imports to take hold -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Biden administration allows ban on some Apple Watch imports to take hold
View
Date:2025-04-20 07:48:47
The Biden administration let stand on Tuesday the U.S. International Trade Commission's ban of imports of Apple Watches stemming from a patent dispute over the devices' blood oxygen monitor. The decision goes into effect Tuesday.
The technology giant said last week it was "preemptively taking steps to comply" in case the ITC ruling held up, by halting sales of the devices in focus. The pause included the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2.
The legal dispute stems from the blood oxygen feature in the devices, which enables Apple Watch users to measure the level of oxygen in their blood. Low blood oxygen levels can lead to serious health problems, according to Cleveland Clinic.
Apple's decision came after the ITC ruled that the tech giant had illegally used blood oxygen technology from Masimo, a medical tech company, in the devices and ordered Apple to stop importing them.
Apple said in a statement Tuesday that, "We strongly disagree with the USITC decision and resulting exclusion order, and are taking all measures to return Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 to customers in the U.S. as soon as possible."
Apple can appeal the ban to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Masimo didn't immediately return requests from CBS News for comment.
While a presidential panel reviewed the ITC's order, Apple preemptively pulled the devices in case the panel upheld the decision.
"After careful consultations, Ambassador [Katherine] Tai decided not to reverse the ITC's determination and the ITC's decision became final on December 26, 2023," the U.S. Trade Representative said in a Tuesday statement.
Apple began including the pulse oximeter feature in its smart watches with its Series 6 model in 2020.
The ban doesn't cover the less costly Apple Watch SE, or other previously sold watches.
- In:
- Apple
- Apple Watch
veryGood! (67842)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Kate Spade Outlet’s Surprise Day Deals Are Colorful & Plentiful, with Chic Bags Starting at $59
- Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift’s Love Is Burning Red at Sydney Eras Tour in Australia
- Machine Gun Kelly Reveals the Truth Behind His Blackout Tattoo
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Taylor Swift is not a psyop, but a fifth of Americans think she is. We shouldn’t be surprised.
- ESPN's Kirk Herbstreit, Chris Fowler and more will be in EA Sports College Football video game
- The Daily Money: In praise of landlines
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- U.S. warns Russia against nuclear-capable anti-satellite weapon
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- What’s next after the Alabama ruling that counts IVF embryos as children?
- He moved in with his grandmas during COVID. Now, they're all going to the Oscars
- Watch melted during atomic blast over Hiroshima sells for more than $31,000
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- What does gender expansive mean? Oklahoma teen's death puts gender identity in spotlight.
- Transcript: 911 caller asking police ‘Help me,’ then screams, preceded deadly standoff in Minnesota
- Hilary Swank recalls the real-life 'Ordinary Angels' that helped her to Hollywood stardom
Recommendation
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Tiger Woods’ son shoots 86 in pre-qualifier for PGA Tour event
7 things you should never ask Siri, Google Assistant or Alexa
A work-from-home tip: Don’t buy stocks after eavesdropping on your spouse’s business calls
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
Watch melted during atomic blast over Hiroshima sells for more than $31,000
This week on Sunday Morning (February 25)
What’s next after the Alabama ruling that counts IVF embryos as children?