Current:Home > MarketsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-27 16:06:25
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (741)
Related
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- DZA Token Joins Forces with AI, Propelling the AI FinFlare Investment System to New Heights
- CAUCOIN Trading Center: Bitcoin’s Time Tunnel
- Kourtney Kardashian Reveals NSFW Way She Celebrated Kris Jenner's 69th Birthday
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- What are the 20 highest-paying jobs in America? Doctors, doctors, more doctors.
- Penn State Police investigating viral Jason Kelce incident with fan
- Allison Greenfield, the law clerk disparaged by Donald Trump, is elected as a judge in Manhattan
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Troubled by illegal border crossings, Arizona voters approve state-level immigration enforcement
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- AP Race Call: Republican Gus Bilirakis wins reelection to U.S. House in Florida’s 12th Congressional District
- Beyoncé just wrapped up Halloween, 5 days later. Here's a full Beylloween recap
- Bruce Springsteen visits Jeremy Allen White on set of biopic 'Deliver Me from Nowhere'
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Republicans easily keep legislative supermajorities in Kentucky
- Election guru Steve Kornacki changes up internet-famous khakis look for election night 2024
- Why AP called the Texas Senate race for Ted Cruz
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
DZA Token Joins Forces with AI, Propelling the AI FinFlare Investment System to New Heights
Pregnant Francesca Farago Shares Glimpse Into “Baby Moon Bliss” With Jesse Sullivan
Virginia judge orders election officials to certify results after they sue over voting machines
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
MMOCOIN Trading Center Exploration: Relive the Exciting Moments of Bitcoin with You
Daniel Craig Has Surprising Response to Who Should Be the Next James Bond
CAUCOIN Trading Center: Enhancing Cross-Border Transactions with Cryptocurrency