Current:Home > reviewsNorth Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID -Trailblazer Capital Learning
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-07 20:12:08
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina’s Supreme Court issued mixed rulings Friday for businesses seeking financial help from the COVID-19 pandemic, declaring one insurer’s policy must cover losses some restaurants and bars incurred but that another insurer’s policy for a nationwide clothing store chain doesn’t due to an exception.
The unanimous decisions by the seven-member court in the pair of cases addressed the requirements of “all-risk” commercial property insurance policies issued by Cincinnati and Zurich American insurance companies to the businesses.
The companies who paid premiums saw reduced business and income, furloughed or laid off employees and even closed from the coronavirus and resulting 2020 state and local government orders limiting commerce and public movement. North Carolina restaurants, for example, were forced for some time to limit sales to takeout or drive-in orders.
In one case, the 16 eating and drinking establishments who sued Cincinnati Insurance Co., Cincinnati Casualty Co. and others held largely similar policies that protected their building and personal property as well as any business income from “direct physical loss” to property not excluded by their policies.
Worried that coverage would be denied for claimed losses, the restaurants and bars sued and sought a court to rule that “direct physical loss” also applied to government-mandated orders. A trial judge sided with them, but a panel of the intermediate-level Court of Appeals disagreed, saying such claims did not have to be accepted because there was no actual physical harm to the property — only a loss of business.
But state Supreme Court Associate Justice Anita Earls, writing for the court, noted he Cincinnati policies did not define “direct physical loss.” Earls also noted there were no specific policy exclusions that would deny coverage for viruses or contaminants. Earls said the court favored any ambiguity toward the policyholders because a reasonable person in their positions would understand the policies include coverage for business income lost from virus-related government orders.
“It is the insurance company’s responsibility to define essential policy terms and the North Carolina courts’ responsibility to enforce those terms consistent with the parties’ reasonable expectations,” Earls wrote.
In the other ruling, the Supreme Court said Cato Corp., which operates more than 1,300 U.S. clothing stores and is headquartered in Charlotte, was properly denied coverage through its “all-risk” policy. Zurich American had refused to cover Cato’s alleged losses, and the company sued.
But while Cato sufficiently alleged a “direct physical loss of or damage” to property, Earls wrote in another opinion, the policy contained a viral contamination exclusion Zurich American had proven applied in this case.
The two cases were among eight related to COVID-19 claims on which the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over two days in October. The justices have yet to rule on most of those matters.
The court did announce Friday that justices were equally divided about a lawsuit filed by then-University of North Carolina students seeking tuition, housing and fee refunds when in-person instruction was canceled during the 2020 spring semester. The Court of Appeals had agreed it was correct to dismiss the suit — the General Assembly had passed a law that gave colleges immunity from such pandemic-related legal claims for that semester. Only six of the justices decided the case — Associate Justice Tamara Barringer did not participate — so the 3-3 deadlock means the Court of Appeals decision stands.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7935)
Related
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Honduran president ends ban on emergency contraception, making it widely available
- UPS workers vote to strike, setting stage for biggest walkout since 1959
- A man dies of a brain-eating amoeba, possibly from rinsing his sinuses with tap water
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- U.S. lawmakers open probe into PGA Tour-LIV Golf plan
- Losing Arctic Ice and Permafrost Will Cost Trillions as Earth Warms, Study Says
- George W. Bush's anti-HIV program is hailed as 'amazing' — and still crucial at 20
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Exodus From Canada’s Oil Sands Continues as Energy Giants Shed Assets
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- North Carolina’s Goal of Slashing Greenhouse Gases Faces Political Reality Test
- Dakota Pipeline Is Ready for Oil, Without Spill Response Plan for Standing Rock
- 13 Things to Pack if You're Traveling Alone for a Safe, Fun & Relaxing Solo Vacation
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- 3 abortion bans in Texas leave doctors 'talking in code' to pregnant patients
- Can Solyndra’s Breakthrough Solar Technology Outlive the Company’s Demise?
- Pandemic food assistance that held back hunger comes to an end
Recommendation
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
They could lose the house — to Medicaid
Tennessee becomes the first state to pass a ban on public drag shows
Deadly tornado rips through North Texas town, leaves utter devastation
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Tenn. Lt. Gov. McNally apologizes after repeatedly commenting on racy Instagram posts
2018’s Hemispheric Heat Wave Wasn’t Possible Without Climate Change, Scientists Say
Keystone XL: Environmental and Native Groups Sue to Halt Pipeline