Current:Home > MarketsFormer prosecutor who resigned from Russia probe investigation tapped for state Supreme Court post -Trailblazer Capital Learning
Former prosecutor who resigned from Russia probe investigation tapped for state Supreme Court post
View
Date:2025-04-15 12:45:13
A former top federal prosecutor who resigned from the investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe has been tapped to fill an open seat on the Connecticut State Supreme Court.
Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont announced Nora Dannehy’s nomination on Friday, calling his former general counsel “a woman of integrity who pursues justice wherever the evidence may lead.” Besides the Trump-Russia probe, Dannehy is well known in Connecticut for leading the successful federal corruption prosecutions of former Republican Gov. John G. Rowland in 2004 and other public figures during her tenure as the first woman U.S. Attorney in Connecticut.
“Nora Dannehy is a person who knows what she knows, but you also know that she cares.” said Lamont, paraphrasing a quote from the late President Franklin D. Roosevelt. “She cares deeply about justice. She’s going to be an extraordinary associate justice on the Supreme Court.”
She will be presented to the Democratic-controlled General Assembly for consideration. Lawmakers are scheduled to meet for a special legislative session later this month.
Dannehy, a 62-year-old Connecticut native, served as U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut from 2008 to 2010. She later was appointed deputy attorney general for the state of Connecticut before becoming taking a job with United Technologies Corporation as associate general counsel for global ethics and compliance.
She rejoined the federal government in early 2019 to help then-Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham scrutinize how the FBI and other federal agencies set out to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and whether the Trump campaign had coordinated with the Kremlin.
Dannehy has not spoken publicly about her decision to leave the Durham investigation during the final stretch. On Friday, she did not take any questions from reporters. Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz, who has known Dannehy since high school, said the administration wanted to give the General Assembly’s Judiciary Committee the first opportunity to question Dannehy.
When a reporter suggested Dannehy will surely be asked about the Durham investigation during her confirmation hearing, Bysiewicz said, “we’ll leave that to the Legislature.”
In brief remarks, Dannehy thanked Lamont for his confidence in her and noted her desire to return to the public realm.
“Recently, I went into private practice with a small firm in Hartford, where I’ve had the fortune to work with excellent lawyers and upstanding people,” she said. “But my heart is in public service.”
Dannehy is Lamont’s second nominee to the state’s highest court this year. In May, Sandra Slack Glover, another federal prosecutor with no judicial experience, withdrew her name from consideration after state lawmakers raised questions about a letter she signed in 2017 supporting Amy Coney Barrett for a federal appeals court position.
Glover tried to assure Connecticut lawmakers that she would not have signed the 2017 letter if she knew Barrett would later vote to overturn Roe v. Wade abortion protections as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Some lawmakers at the time voiced concern about her lack of judicial experience and said they had many unanswered questions about how she would perform on the bench.
On Friday, Lamont said he believes legislators are much more familiar with Dannehy. Also, he said his administration learned from the failed Glover nomination to talk to all the legislators and “make sure nobody jumps to conclusions” about a nominee’s record. He said he’s confident Dannehy will be confirmed.
There was some pushback Friday to Dannehy’s nomination from activists who contend Lamont should look beyond prosecutors for judicial candidates.
“Just like a jury needs to contain a cross section of the community with different points of view, different backgrounds and different heritage, the judiciary should contain a cross section of views across the legal system, said civil rights attorney Alexander Taubes, a member of the People’s Parity Project.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- The main reason why self-driving cars are not ready for prime time
- RHONJ's Melissa Gorga Shares How She Feels About Keeping Distance From Teresa Giudice This Season
- Paul Auster, 'The New York Trilogy' author and filmmaker, dies at 77
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- You Need to See Princess Charlotte’s Royally Cute 9th Birthday Portrait
- Walnuts sold in at least 19 states linked to E. coli outbreak in California, Washington: See map
- Fed holds interest rates steady, gives no sign it will cut soon as inflation fight stalls
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Advocates say Supreme Court must preserve new, mostly Black US House district for 2024 elections
Ranking
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- What is May's birthstone? A guide to the colorful gem and its symbolism
- Gypsy Rose Blanchard Reveals How Her Nose Job Impacted Her Ego
- One Tech Tip: How to repair an electric toothbrush
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Abortion is still consuming US politics and courts 2 years after a Supreme Court draft was leaked
- Britney Spears and Sam Asghari Settle Divorce 8 Months After Breakup
- Fed holds interest rates steady, gives no sign it will cut soon as inflation fight stalls
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Melissa McCarthy reacts to Barbra Streisand's awkward Ozempic comment: 'I win the day'
UnitedHealth data breach caused by lack of multifactor authentication, CEO says
Exxon Criticized ICN Stories Publicly, But Privately, Didn’t Dispute The Findings
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Historic Agreement with the Federal Government and Arizona Gives Colorado River Indian Tribes Control Over Use of Their Water off Tribal Land
Nick Viall and Natalie Joy Cancel Honeymoon After “Nightmare” Turn of Events
Ethan Hawke and Maya Hawke have a running joke about ‘Wildcat,’ their Flannery O’Connor movie