Current:Home > ScamsThe Supreme Court will hear a case with a lot of ‘buts’ & ‘ifs’ over the meaning of ‘and’ -Trailblazer Capital Learning
The Supreme Court will hear a case with a lot of ‘buts’ & ‘ifs’ over the meaning of ‘and’
Rekubit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 04:44:38
WASHINGTON (AP) — It’s hard to imagine a less contentious or more innocent word than “and.”
But how to interpret that simple conjunction has prompted a complicated legal fight that lands in the Supreme Court on Oct. 2, the first day of its new term. What the justices decide could affect thousands of prison sentences each year.
Federal courts across the country disagree about whether the word, as it is used in a bipartisan 2018 criminal justice overhaul, indeed means “and” or whether it means “or.” Even an appellate panel that upheld a longer sentence called the structure of the provision “perplexing.”
The Supreme Court has stepped in to settle the dispute.
It’s the kind of task the justices — and maybe their English teachers — love. The case requires the close parsing of a part of a federal statute, the First Step Act, which aimed in part to reduce mandatory minimum sentences and give judges more discretion.
In particular, the justices will be examining a so-called safety valve provision that is meant to spare low-level, nonviolent drug dealers who agree to plead guilty and cooperate with prosecutors from having to face often longer mandatory sentences.
It’s much more than an exercise in diagramming a sentence. Nearly 6,000 people convicted of drug trafficking in the 2021 budget year alone are in the pool of those who might be eligible for reduced sentences, according to data compiled by the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
Overall, more than 10,000 people sentenced since the law took effect could be affected, according to Douglas Berman, an expert on sentencing at Ohio State University’s law school.
The provision lists three criteria for allowing judges to forgo a mandatory minimum sentence that basically look to the severity of prior crimes. Congress did not make it easy by writing the section in the negative so that a judge can exercise discretion in sentencing if a defendant “does not have” three sorts of criminal history.
The question is how to determine eligibility for the safety valve — whether any of the conditions is enough to disqualify someone or whether it takes all three to be ineligible.
Lawyers for Mark Pulsifer, the inmate whose challenge the court will hear, say all three conditions must apply before the longer sentence can be imposed. The government says just one condition is enough to merit the mandatory minimum.
Pulsifer pleaded guilty to one count of distributing at least 50 grams of methamphetamine. Two of the three conditions applied to Pulsifer, and that was enough for the trial court and the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to make him eligible for a mandatory sentence of at least 15 years. He actually received a 13 1/2-year sentence for unrelated reasons.
Now 61, Pulsifer is not scheduled to be released from prison until 2031, according to federal Bureau of Prison records.
Appeals courts based in Chicago, Cincinnati and New Orleans also have ruled against defendants. Courts in Atlanta, Richmond, Virginia and San Francisco have ruled to broaden eligibility for the safety valve reductions.
In one case in Texas, Nonami Palomares, who was caught with heroin at the U.S.-Mexican border, was given a mandatory 10-year sentence because she had a previous 20-year-old drug offense. She might otherwise have had two years knocked off her sentence.
But in San Diego, Eric Lopez had about 45 pounds of meth on him when he was arrested qualified for the safety valve, despite his own earlier conviction, and avoided an additional year behind bars. U.S. District Judge James Lorenz wrote in Lopez’s case that the law was ambiguous.
Both Palomares’ and Lopez’s cases could be affected by the Supreme Court’s decision.
Linguists who specialize in the law submitted a brief in which they wrote that surveys they conducted found people thought the language was either ambiguous or should be read the way Pulsifer’s legal team argues.
FAMM, which advocates against mandatory minimum sentences, has joined criminal defense lawyers and the American Civil Liberties Union in a filing that argues that mandatory sentences “are entirely at odds with what Congress sought to achieve in amending the safety-valve provision: that judges be allowed to use their discretion when sentencing low-level, nonviolent drug offenders.”
Berman said the language of the statute alone points to a broad reading that would favor defendants. “But the concern about the broad reading is that it basically covers everybody. I think it’s right that that wasn’t Congress’ intent,” Berman said, echoing arguments made by judges who sided with prosecutors.
On a court in which several justices across the ideological spectrum say they are guided by the words Congress chooses, with less regard for congressional intent, that might be enough to favor defendants. In addition, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s prior experience as a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission also could be important to the court’s resolution of the case.
The safety valve has been attractive both to prosecutors and defendants because it helps obtain convictions faster and allows for more nuanced prison terms, Berman said.
Congress could clarify the law, no matter which side wins. Even if Pulsifer prevails, judges will not be obligated to impose lower sentences, Berman said. They just will not be compelled to give mandatory ones.
A decision in Pulsifer v. U.S., 22-340, is expected by spring.
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Fire at a popular open market in Bangkok spews black smoke visible for miles
- New EU gig worker rules will sort out who should get the benefits of full-time employees
- Could a sex scandal force Moms for Liberty cofounder off school board? What we know.
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- News outlets and NGOs condemn Hungary’s new ‘sovereignty protection’ law as a way to silence critics
- College Football Playoff ticket prices: Cost to see Rose Bowl, Sugar Bowl highest in years
- The Supreme Court will hear arguments about mifepristone. What is the drug and how does it work?
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Forget 'hallucinate' and 'rizz.' What should the word of the year actually be?
Ranking
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Hunter Biden defies House Republicans' subpoena for closed-door testimony
- Lawyers and prosecutors make final arguments in trial of 3 Washington state officers
- Tennessee audit says state prisons mishandled sexual assault cases. Here's why the problem could worsen
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Author Cait Corrain loses book deal after creating fake profiles for bad reviews on Goodreads
- Washington state college student dies and two others are sickened in apparent carbon monoxide leak
- Friends and teammates at every stage, Spanish players support each other again at Cal
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Orbán says Hungary will block EU membership negotiations for Ukraine at a crucial summit this week
Millions infected with dengue this year in new record as hotter temperatures cause virus to flare
SmileDirectClub is shutting down. Where does that leave its customers?
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Biden to meet in person Wednesday with families of Americans taken hostage by Hamas
Brooke Shields' Daughter Grier Rewears Her Mom's Iconic Little Black Dress From 2006
Why it's so hard to resist holiday sales (and how to try)